document the Terms of Engagement to provide Advisory Services in writing and should obtain the written agreement to those terms by the Client.
Set out the range of available options that must be formal and informal.
Do not consider resignation an option.
Do not deliberately prefer creditors.
Avoid dissipating assets.
Seek independent legal advice on matters which may impact the director personally.
Conduct relevant searches of the PPSR and identify security held by creditors.
Bring the company’s financial records up-to-date.
Review trade and expense creditors. Identify those creditors where directors or other third parties have personally guaranteed the performance of the company.
Carefully consider whether the company should accept delivery of goods and review service subscriptions where this increases lines of credit.
Do not incur further credit until such time that availability of an insolvency safe harbour can be established. However, trading my continue where cash is paid on delivery of goods or services (provided this is carrying on the business in so far as is beneficial to the company or creditors).
Before accepting any Engagement to provide Advisory Services, a Member should establish with the Client realistic expectations of the objectives, scope of work,
possible benefits/outcomes, timing and fee structure of the Advisory Services.
Prior to commencing an Engagement to provide Advisory Services, a Member must clearly set out Terms of the Engagement in writing. The Terms of Engagement should
include:
Any material changes to the Terms of Engagement to provide Advisory Services should be confirmed in writing with the Client.
Any obligation to report to appropriate authorities within or external to the Client organisation, any occurrences of malfeasance, dangerous behaviour or illegal
activities discovered during the course of an Engagement should be disclosed to the Client and included as part of the Terms of Engagement.
A Member must agree in advance with the Client on the basis for Remuneration and Disbursements for Advisory services.
The Member should advise the Client of the likely total quantum of Remuneration, or range of possible Remuneration, under the proposed method. Alternatively, where
the Terms of the Engagement are such that it is not possible to provide a quantum of Remuneration or range of possible Remuneration, sufficient information should be
provided to the Client to enable the Client to determine possible Remuneration outcomes.
Text missing
5.PPS Safe Harbour Advisory – Best Practice
6.PPS Informal Creditor Negotiations and Workouts
Membership of the ABRT is personal to an individual Restructuring & Turnaround Practitioner. ABRT Members have an obligation to ensure that engagements [1] are effectively managed, controlled and administered at all times.
Issues can arise when an ABRT Member is working as part of a turnaround team [2], takes engagements jointly or delegates work to employees or contractors. In such circumstances, the ABRT Member’s planning and administrative arrangements will need to consider how best to ensure that engagements are properly managed and controlled at all times, and that proper regard is paid to the interests of the client and other affected parties.
Given there is a wide variation in the size of an ABRT Member’s firm [3], each will have a different caseload that is likely to fluctuate. Access to resources will also be highly variable for individual ABRT Members. This creates different requirements in the delegation of work to ensure adequate management and progression of engagements for the client.
Delegation includes:
For each of the above examples (and in other circumstances where delegation takes place), the ABRT Member must be satisfied at all times that work is being carried out in a proper and efficient manner, appropriate to the engagement and the satisfaction of the client.
In determining the procedures to be put in place to ensure the appropriate level of management, control and progression of engagements when delegating work, it is recommended that an ABRT Member have regard to the following:
ABRT Members should be aware that they may be required to justify their decisions and demonstrate they put in place appropriate levels of control to effectively manage engagements.
Depending on the nature, size and complexity of an engagement, ABRT Members should consider documenting procedures that set out guidance for the client’s engagement and have this agreed in writing on a case by case basis. ABRT Members are expected to prepare their own contemporaneous working papers, file notes and Client Advisory Record [7] on client engagements.
Should you require additional guidance on this PPS or have feedback, please email peakpps@abrt.org.au.
Version 1.3 – Maintained 18.08.20
———————————————–
[1] An ABRT Member’s formally agreed client engagement terms.
[2] Depending on the nature of an organisation’s industry, and the size and complexity of the situation, may be more appropriate for directors to engage a ‘turnaround team’ – multiple advisers, all tasked with assisting in specific areas, and whose advice collectively inform the decisions of the board (and do not conflict with advice the director may wish to receive on a personal level).
[3] Reference to ‘firm’ includes, as appropriate, a company, a partnership, a sole practitioner, and a practitioner working in association with other ‘firms’ or practitioners in other ‘firms’.
[4] This could include (but is not limited to) matters requiring input from accountants, solicitors, taxation agents, independent valuers, insolvency practitioners or industry experts).
[5] See 9.PPS – Dealing with Complaints.
[6] See 8.PPS – Succession Planning.
[7] See 4.PPS – Client Advisory Record.
Membership of the ABRT is personal to an individual Restructuring & Turnaround Practitioner. ABRT Members have an obligation to ensure that engagements [1] are effectively managed, controlled and administered at all times; and to have appropriate contingency arrangements in place to cover unexpected changes in circumstances. The over-riding principle is that the interests of the client and other stakeholders should not be prejudiced.
Issues of succession can be mitigated where an ABRT Member is working as part of a turnaround team [2], takes engagements jointly or delegates work to employees or contractors. An ABRT Member’s system for managing engagements [3] will need to consider on a regular basis the arrangements in place to ensure continuity and case progression in the event of death, incapacity to act, retirement from practice, or the practitioner otherwise retiring.
ABRT Members who are sole restructuring and turnaround practitioners should consider the steps necessary to put a workable Continuity Agreement in place. The full consequences, both practical and financial, of the relationship must be recognised by both the ABRT Member and their nominated successor so that continuity can be achieved, and the interests of the client and other stakeholders safeguarded.
In particular, the nominated successor needs to consider whether the obligations arising from a successor arrangement can be discharged properly and expeditiously, having regard to the number and nature of engagements to be taken over.
A retiring ABRT Member practitioner should have in place arrangements for the transfer of active cases in sufficient time to ensure that the cases are transferred before the retirement takes place or the professional indemnity insurance lapses.
If the nominated successor is an ABRT Member, the transfer of cases should be facilitated as soon as possible after the other restructuring and turnaround practitioner’s death, incapacity or, if no other arrangements have been made, retirement. The arrangements with the nominated successor will need to be reviewed as circumstances dictate, but at annually at a minimum.
The principal matters that might routinely be dealt with in a Continuity Agreement are set out at 6 below.
Every ABRT Member Practitioner in a firm[4] (whether a principal or an employee) should consider the comments made above regarding sole restructuring and turnaround practitioners, and should discuss with the firm the arrangements for succession planning, to cover death, incapacity to act, retirement, or leaving the firm. It is recommended that this is reflected in an agreement or documented set of procedures.
Where there are no other ABRT Member Practitioners in a firm, and in the absence of any contractual arrangements to deal with death, incapacity to act, or retirement, an ABRT Member should have already considered the remaining partners or directors memberships of professional bodies, skillsets, qualification and experience to ensure the proper management of active practice engagements. This includes documenting the procedures and arrangements for another suitably qualified restructuring and turnaround practitioner to take the lead on the caseload.
The principal matters that might routinely be dealt with in an ABRT Member’s Succession Plan are set out at 6 below.
ABRT Members are not permitted to allow commercial disputes to obscure the over-riding principle set out at the beginning of this paper – that the interests of the client and other stakeholders should not be prejudiced.
It is important, therefore, that the contractual arrangements referred to above should provide for the (essentially) mechanistic and financial consequences of an ABRT Member leaving the firm (or upon incapacity to act). There should be similar considerations when an ABRT Member (either partner or employee) is suspended by a firm or is otherwise excluded from the firm’s offices.
If there is a dispute, it is for the ABRT Member to decide how best to ensure that their professional obligations can be discharged. The Association for Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman (ASBFEO) may be utilised for alternate dispute resolution (ADR). It is always open to an ABRT Member to consult with the ABRT Board.
As noted above, there may be professional obligations on remaining partners, directors or colleagues to arrange for the proper management of their firm’s engagements, and so ensure that they do not bring their own professional bodies into disrepute (such is the case where there are other ABRT Members, regulated Insolvency Practitioners, and/or lawyers or accountants in practice).
Principal matters that might be dealt with in a Continuity Agreement:
A clear statement of the circumstances upon which the agreement would become operative, and also the circumstances in which the nominated successor can decline to act.
The extent and frequency of disclosure to the nominated successor of case details and financial information.
Detailed provisions to provide for:
Principal matters that might be dealt with in an ABRT Member’s Succession Agreement:
Where the agreement provides for another ABRT Member or restructuring & turnaround practitioner (whether in the firm or in another firm) to take over appointments:
Should you require additional guidance on this PPS or have feedback, please email peakpps@abrt.org.au.
Version 1.3 – Maintained 18.08.20
———————————————–
[1] An ABRT Member’s formally agreed client engagement terms.
[2] Depending on the nature of an organisation’s industry, and the size and complexity of the situation, may be more appropriate for directors to engage a ‘turnaround team’ – multiple advisers, all tasked with assisting in specific areas, and whose advices collectively inform the decisions of the board (and do not conflict with advice the director may wish to receive on a personal level).
[3] See 7.PPS – Managing Engagements.
[4] Reference to ‘firm’ includes, as appropriate, a company, a partnership, a sole practitioner, and a practitioner working in association with other ‘firms’ or practitioners in other ‘firms’.
[5] See 3.PPS – Record Keeping
[6] See 4.PPS – Client Advisory Record.
Membership of the ABRT is personal to an individual Restructuring & Turnaround Practitioner. ABRT Members have an obligation to ensure that engagements[1] are effectively managed, controlled and administered at all times. It is in the interest of complainants and ABRT Members, and in the wider public interest, that complaints are dealt with professionally and expeditiously. Failure to do so can only exacerbate any problem, prolong any sense of grievance felt by a complainant, and undermine confidence in the restructuring and turnaround profession.
As a result, practitioners, their firms[2] and the profession may be brought into disrepute. This paper is intended to remind ABRT Members of their duty to deal properly with complaints, and to suggest some matters that might usefully be considered. It is recognised that ABRT Members may hold other professional memberships or be regulated by government authorities and, as such, their rules may override this ABRT Guidance Material.
It is likely that the following steps will be appropriate:
It is a feature of the work of ABRT Members that complaints may arise because of an incomplete understanding of the professional standards by which they are required to act. In many cases, actions or outcomes that are obvious to ABRT Members may be seen as wrong or unfair by complainants, as ABRT have certain duties, obligations and responsibilities may not be easily misunderstood. When responding to a complaint, an ABRT Member should provide, where appropriate, a clear explanation of their duties, obligations, responsibilities, professional standards and any relevant legislation.
The matters that an ABRT Member should consider in relation to complaints include:
A complaint may, in some circumstances, have to be notified to an ABRT Member’s professional indemnity insurer. In such cases, any action or response by the ABRT Member will necessarily be subject to any conditions imposed by the insurer.
[1] An ABRT Member’s formally agreed client engagement terms.
[2] Reference to ‘firm’ includes, as appropriate, a company, a partnership, a sole practitioner, and a practitioner working in association with other ‘firms’ or practitioners in other ‘firms’.
[3] See ABRT Guidance Material ‘Managing Engagements’.
[4] See ABRT Guidance Material ‘Client Advisory Record’.
[5] See ABRT Guidance Material ‘Record Keeping.
[6] See ABRT Guidance Material ‘Succession Planning’.
There are no prohibitions on a Member who is providing Advisory Services, proposes
to provide Advisory Services, or who has previously provided Advisory Services to a
Client:
However, in such a situation, the Member must not advise the Client in respect of that transaction and must, in writing, advise the Client that:
For the purposes of this section of the Standard, Member extends to the Member’sFirm, Partners and Related Entities.
ABRT – HQ
Get in touch
Web Design and Development by D’Oporto Studio
HQ
96 Sir Donald Bradman Dr,
c/ BHA,
Hilton SA 5033
Get in touch
Web Design and Development by D’Oporto Studio
HQ
96 Sir Donald Bradman Dr,
c/ BHA,
Hilton SA 5033
Get in touch
Web Design and Development by
D’Oporto Studio